Editor Resources
Tools and references to support consistent editorial decision making.
Resources that support efficient editorial workflows
JTRR provides editors with guidelines, templates, and policy references to maintain consistent decisions.
Resources help ensure transparency, reproducibility, and timely outcomes.
Decision templates
Standardized decision letter frameworks for clarity.
Reviewer database
Access to reviewer expertise profiles and histories.
Reporting guidelines
Links to CONSORT, PRISMA, ARRIVE, and STROBE resources.
Ethics policies
Guidance on conflicts, consent, and integrity checks.
Editorial workflow
Step by step guidance for handling submissions.
Metrics dashboard
Visibility into review timelines and decision outcomes.
Checklists
Quick reference checklists for scope and methodology.
Author support materials
Resources for communicating revision requests.
- Use decision templates to ensure consistent language.
- Record conflicts and reassign manuscripts when needed.
- Encourage data availability statements for all research articles.
- Document rationale for major decisions in the editorial system.
- Escalate ethical concerns to the editorial office promptly.
- Monitor reviewer timeliness and follow up as needed.
Decision letters should summarize major reviewer concerns and outline clear next steps for authors. Consistent messaging reduces confusion and speeds revisions.
When rejecting a manuscript, provide constructive rationale to help authors improve the work for future submission elsewhere.
The editorial office can provide support for complex ethics questions, reviewer delays, or policy interpretations. Reach out early to avoid bottlenecks.
If you need assistance locating reviewers, the office can suggest candidates based on subject expertise.
Well organized resources help editors deliver clear, fair, and timely decisions.
Join the JTRR Editorial Community
Help guide the journal and support high quality decisions in regenerative medicine.
